"As coisas se desdobraram de acordo com o cenário pré-escrito preparado por Washington. Não há dúvida de que os americanos lançam a 'primeira farsa' em tudo isso", declarou Shulgin, acrescentando que o "ataque" foi encenado por "ONGs pseudo-humanitárias", que estão sob o patrocínio dos adversários estrangeiros do governo sírio.
2-Os EUA, o Reino Unido e a França recorreram a ataques contra a Síria porque sofreram uma derrota no país tanto em campo como na mesa de negociações, acredita a líder da Plataforma Astana da oposição síria, Randa Kassis
3-O presidente da Alemanha, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, pediu o fim da demonização da Rússia e de seu povo no último domingo. Ele acrescentou que Berlim deveria fazer mais para ajudar a diminuir as tensões, dada a história única de seu país com a Rússia.
Steinmeier alertou que os ataques aéreos liderados pelos EUA na Síria nas primeiras horas da manhã de sábado aumentaram o risco de confronto direto entre as forças dos EUA e da Rússia que operam no território sírio.
4- Les récentes actions militaires des États-Unis, du Royaume-Uni et de la France en Syrie aggravent non seulement la crise syrienne, mais auront aussi un impact négatif sur la dénucléarisation de la péninsule coréenne, Pyongyang considérant les armes nucléaires comme la seule garantie contre une intervention américaine, relatent des médias chinois.
5 ~Les frappes ont détruit un “mystérieux laboratoire” chimique – qui était sous surveillance régulière de l’OIAC
6 -There is a very large discrepancy between the Russian Ministry of Defense report of strike and the description in the Pentagon briefing on the strike. According to the Pentagon only three places related to non-existing Syrian chemical weapons were targeted:
This combined military strike was directed against three distinct Syrian chemical weapons program targets.
...
In summary, in a powerful show of allied unity, we deployed 105 weapons against three targets.
It does not make any sense to send 35 cruise missiles against each of those not hardened, not defended targets like the now destroyed Barzeh research centerwhich was a small two story building complex (pic of destruction) and had been declared free of chemical weapons and weapon research by the OPCW. Why would the U.S. military use such a high number of precision weapons against only three targets? This is extremely unusual and does not make sense at all.
Four missiles targeted the Damascus International Airport; 12 missiles – the Al-Dumayr airdrome, all the missiles have been shot down.18 missiles targeted the Blai airdrome, all the missiles shot down.
12 missiles targeted the Shayrat air base, all the missiles shot down. Air bases were not affected by the strike.
Five out of nine missiles were shot down targeting the unoccupied Mazzeh airdrome.
Thirteen out of sixteen missiles were shot down targeting the Homs airdrome. There are no heavy destructions.
In total 30 missiles targeted facilities near Barzah and Jaramana. Seven of them have been shot down.
At least six airports were targeted according to the Russian report. The Pentagon reports no strike on Syrian airports but claims to have launched a way too high number of cruise missiles for each of the claimed three target. The Syrian opposition outlet SOHR reports of eight targets and says that at least 65 of the cruise missiles were downed by the Syrian air defenses. The Russians say 71 were shot down while the Pentagon says none of its cruise missiles were hit.
At least three other sources confirm the Russian version of events. The Pentagon is lying. The attack was a U.S. attempt to disable the Syrian air force by destroying its airports. It failed and the Pentagon is hiding that failure. Will the U.S. media report this discrepancy?
Not unrelated to the strike on Syria is the Skripal case where the mysteries continue to pile up.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário